Production and characteristics of protein hydrolysate from tra fish (Pangasius hypophthalmus)
The goal of this study was investigate effects of pH and temperature on the production of tra fish protein hydrolysate (FPH) fish protein concentrate (FPC) using alcalase and characterization of FPHs. Temperature of 55 oC and pH 8.5 were the best condition for highest degree of hydrolysis (around 55%) after 60 min of reaction. Under hydrolysis, protein solubility was significantly increased from 4% to >90%. FPC contained fractions of 50, 40, 37, 15, 12, and 11×103 g/mol. After 15 or 120 min of enzymatic reaction, molecular weight was degraded to 4.86 and 4.31 (x103 g/mol) of FPH15 or FPH120 samples. Due to the increasing of protein solubility during the hydrolysis, water holding capacity reduced from 2.81 ml/g (FPC) to <0.3 ml/g of FPH15 and FPH120 samples. Besides, emulsion activity index and emulsion stability index of samples were ordered as FPH15>FPH120>FPC and FPH120>FPH15>FPC. Furthermore, foam activity index and foam stability index of samples were arranged as FPH15>FPH120> FPC. At pH 4.0, all these indexes were lowest. Generally, under enzymatic hydrolysis, FPH could be possessed of different molecular weights and physico-chemical properties. Thus, FPH could reach various demand of industrial applications.
Agilent, T. (2015). Polymer Molecular Weight Distribution and Definitions of MW Averages - Technical Overview. Retrieved from https://www.agilent.com/cs/library/technicaloverviews/public/5990-7890EN.pdf.
Asbjørngildberg, G. (1993). Enzymic processing of marine raw materials. Process Biochemistry, 28(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-9592(94)80030-8.
Bhaskar, N., & Mahendrakar, N. (2008). Protein hydrolysate from visceral waste proteins of Catla (Catla catla): Optimization of hydrolysis conditions for a commercial neutral protease. Bioresource Technology, 99, 4105-4111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.006
Boikess, R. K., Breslauer & Edelson, E. (1986). Elements of Chemistry - General organic and biological. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
Chalamaiah, M., Narsing Rao, G., Rao, D. G., & Jyothirmayi, T. (2010). Protein hydrolysates from meriga (Cirrhinus mrigala) egg and evaluation of their functional properties. Food Chemistry, 120, 652-657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.10.057
Chobert, J., Bertrand-Harb, C., & Nicolas, M. (1988). Solubility and emulsifying properties of caseins and whey proteins modified enzymatically by trypsin. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 36, 883-886. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00083a002
Clemente, A. (2000). Enzymatic protein hydrolysates in human nutrition. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 11, 254-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(01)00007-3
Damodaran, S. (1996). Amino acids, peptides and proteins. In O. R. Fennema (Ed.), Food chemistry (4th edition). Marcel Dekker, Inc., 321-429.
Demetriades, K., Coupland, J. N., & And Mcclements, D. J. (1997). Physical properties of whey protein stabilized emulsions as related to pH and NaCl. Journal of Food Science, 62(2), 342-347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1997.tb03997.x
Gbogouri, G., Linder, M., Fanni, J., & Parmentier, M. (2004). Influence of hydrolysis degree on the functional properties of salmon byproducts hydrolysates. Journal of Food Science, 69, 615-622. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.tb09909.x
Herman, C., & Malcolm, H. (1944). Studies of the effect of sodium azide on microbic growth and respiration. Journal of Bacteriology, 47, 239-251.
Hoyle, N., & Merritt, J. (1994). Quality of fish protein hydrolysates from herring (Clupea harengus). Journal of Food Science, 59, 76-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1994.tb06901.x
Klompong, V., Benjakul, S., Kantachote, D., & Shahidi, F. (2007). Antioxidative activity and functional properties of protein hydrolysate of yellow stripe trevally (Selaroides leptolepis) as influence by the degree of hydrolysis and enzyme type. Food Chemistry, 102, 1317-1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.07.016
Kristinsson, H. G., & Rasco, B. A. (2000). Fish Protein Hydrolysates: Production, Biochemical, and Functional Properties. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 40(1), 43-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408690091189266
Lee, S. M., & Yamauchi, K. (1987). Emulsifying properties of peptides obtained from the hydrolysates of ß-casein. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 51, 161-166. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb1961.51.1535
Linder, M., Fanni, J., & Parmentier, M. (1996). Functional properties of veal bone hydrolysates. Journal of Food Science, 61, 712-716. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1996.tb12187.x
Marchbank, T., Limdi, J. K., Mahmood, A., Elia, G., & Playford, R. J. (2008). Clinical trial: Protective effect of a commercial ?sh protein hydrolysate against indomethacin (NSAID)-induced small intestinal injury. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 28(6), 799-804. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03783.x
Martin, A., Grolle, K., Bos, M. A., Stuart, M., & Vanvliet, T. (2002). Network forming properties of various proteins adsorbed at the air/water interface in relation to foam stability. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 254, 175-183.
Montecalvo, J., Constantinides, S., & Yang, S. (1984). Enzymatic modification of fish frame protein isolate. Journal of Food Science, 49, 1305-1309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1984.tb14975.x
Mukhin, V., & Novikov, V. (2001). Enzymatic hydrolysis of proteins from Crustaceans of the Barents Sea. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology, 37(5), 538-542. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010218712622
Naqash, S., & Nazeer, R. (2011). Antioxidant and functional properties of protein hydrolysates from pink perch (Nemipterus japonicus) muscle. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 50, 978-978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0416-y
Nesse, K. O., Nagalakshmi, A. P., Marimuthu, P., & Singh., M. (2011). Ef?cacy of a ?sh protein hydrolysate in malnourished children. Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry, 26(4), 360-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-011-0145-z
Nielsen, P. (1995). Enzyme technology for production. Denmark: Novo, 1-5.
Novozymes. (2016). Protease for biocatalysis for smarter chemical synthetic. Retrieved from https://www.novozymes.com/-/media/Project/Novozymes/Website/website/document-library/Advance-your-business/Pharma/Biocatalysis_brochure_Proteases.pdf.
Nurdiani, R., Nurdiani, R., Nurdiani, R., Donkor, O., Singh, T. K., & Vasiljevic, T. (2016). In vitro study of selected physiological and physicochemical properties of fsh protein hydrolysates from 4 Australian fsh species. International Food Research Journal, 23(5), 2029-2040.
Pacheco-Aguilar, R. M.-M.-S. (2008). Functional properties of fish protein hydrolysates from Pacific whiting (Merluccius productus) muscle produced by a commercial protease. Food Chemistry, 109, 782-789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.01.047
Pearce, K., & Kinsella, J. (1978). Emulsifying properties of proteins: Evaluation of a turbidimetric technique. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 26, 716-723. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf60217a041
Phillips, L., Whitehead, D., & Kinsella, J. (1994). Protein stabilized foams. In L. G. Phillips, D.M. Whitehead, & J. E. Kinsella (Eds.), Structure-function of food proteins. Academic Press, 131-152.
Rasco, H. G., & Barbara, A. (2000). Fish Protein Hydrolysates: Production, Biochemical, and Functional Properties. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 40(1), 43-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408690091189266
Rodríguez-Ambriz, S., Martínez-Ayala, A., & Millán, F. A.-O. (2005). Composition and functional properties of Lupinus campestris protein isolates. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 60, 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-005-6835-z
Sathivel, S., Bechtel, J. P., Babbitt, J., Smiley, S., Crapo, C., Reppond, K., & Al, E. (2003). Biochemical and functional properties of herring (Clupea harengus) byproduct hydrolysates. Journal of Food Science, 68, 2196-2200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb05746.x
Sikorski, Z. E. (2002). Chemical and Functional Properties of Food Components. Second Edition. CRC Press.
Sze-Tao, K., & Sathe, S. (2000). Functional properties and in vitro digestibility of almond (Prunus dulcis L.) protein isolate. Food Chemistry, 69(2), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(99)00244-7
Taheri, A., Anvar, S., H., A., & Fogliano, V. (2013). Comparison the functional properties of protein Hydrolysates from poultry byproducts and rainbow trout (Onchorhynchus mykiss) viscera. Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences, 12, 154-169.
Trinh, K. S., Nguyen, T. L., Le, T. T., & Le, T. N. (2017). Production of fish protein concentrate (FPC) from Pangasius Catfish and study on the effect of sodium chloride, sodium tripolyphosphate, sucrose and sorbitol to the protein solubility and water holding capacity of FPC. Journal of Science and Technology Development, 20(T1), 93-103.
Trudel, J., & Asselin, A. (1989). Detection of chitinase activity after polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Analytical Biochemistry, 178, 362-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(89)90653-2
Vojdani, F. (1996). Solubility. In: Methods of Testing Protein Functionality. Hall, G.M. (Ed.). Blackie Academic & Professional.
Wilde, P., & Clark, D. (1996). The competitive displacement of blactoglobulin by Tween 20 from oil–water and air–water interfaces. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 155, 48-54. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1993.1008
Windsore, M. (2001). Fish Protein Concentrate. Torry Research Station, Torry Advisory Note No.39. FAO Corporate Document Repository.
- There are currently no refbacks.
J. Bioen. Food Sci., Macapá, AP, Brazil. eISSN 2359-2710
The journal is licensed with Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional
Address for correspondence
Professor Victor Hugo Gomes Sales
Journal of Bioenergy and Food Science
Federal Institute of Amapá, Campus Macapá.
Rodovia BR 210 KM 3, s/n Bairro Brasil Novo. CEP: 68.909-398. Macapá, Brazil.
Phone: +55 (96) 3198-2150
firstname.lastname@example.org | email@example.com